Does Infinity Exist? |
|
|
|
|
Mar 10 2010, 12:29 PM
|

Hitler's Wet Dream.

Group: Site Administrator
Posts: 66,323
Joined: 4-October 05
From: Glenburn, Paisley
Member No.: 53,387
Status: Offline
Mood:

|
It has been discovered blackholes actually slowly die, they somehow radiate energy in gravity waves.
Perhaps Black holes (not the event horizon, the "Actual Stuff") has a real size?
Also the Big Bang seems to suggest our universe isnt endless either (Although, the big bang is a Theory, it is the most widely accepted one), just really really really big. So the universe does not go for infinity.
Theres a Limited Speed, Mass/energy in the universe and size. If there is a limit on everything there is a limit on complexity. Do we realy know of any instances in which infinity does exist, or have we created the concept?
Generally it is believed that you will never measure anything to have an infinite value. So in that sense, infinities do not exist in nature.
Simply put, we can only measure real numbers. Infinity is not a real number.
That said, in a physical theory, that is a mathematical model we can have many non-observable constructs. These maybe infinite. For example, the vacuum energy density can be infinite in quantum field theory (It is a nieve calculation, but assuming a continuous structure at all scales etc you can show that the zero-point energy is infinite. In standard approaches it QFT you are then free to redefine the vacuum energy by subtracting off the zero-point energy giving a zero energy denisty). Only measurable energies are constructed as finite differences.
In physics the presence of some (measurable) quantity blowing up to infinity is usually seen as the signature of the breakdown of a theory. This means theory is unable to cope with what it is being asked to do.
Discuss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 10 2010, 1:39 PM
|

Profileheaven Egghead.
      
Group: Advanced Forum Member
Posts: 4,045
Joined: 15-September 06
Member No.: 239,418
Status: Offline
Mood:

|
QUOTE(GudJohnSenXI @ Mar 10 2010, 12:29 PM)  Also the Big Bang seems to suggest our universe isnt endless either (Although, the big bang is a Theory, it is the most widely accepted one), just really really really big. So the universe does not go for infinity. Just to correct this, the Big Bang theory isn't an event that explains the creation of the universe, merely its expansion and present state. Before the Big Bang, the universe still existed, it just happened to be an incredibly dense singularity from which nothing (including time) escaped. As far as we can tell, the universe has always existed. In fact, if I understand it correctly, the first law of thermodynamics dictates it must have always been so. The rest of your post is probably beyond the limits of my scientific and mathematical mind which has severely dulled from 4 years working in television.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 10 2010, 1:42 PM
|

Hitler's Wet Dream.

Group: Site Administrator
Posts: 66,323
Joined: 4-October 05
From: Glenburn, Paisley
Member No.: 53,387
Status: Offline
Mood:

|
QUOTE(DougieFFC @ Mar 10 2010, 1:39 PM)  Just to correct this, the Big Bang theory isn't an event that explains the creation of the universe, merely its expansion and present state. Before the Big Bang, the universe still existed, it just happened to be an incredibly dense singularity from which nothing (including time) escaped. As far as we can tell, the universe has always existed. In fact, if I understand it correctly, the first law of thermodynamics dictates it must have always been so.
The rest of your post is probably beyond the limits of my scientific and mathematical mind which has severely dulled from 4 years working in television. Ah true. I have also heard the concept that the Bing band occurs due to a 'previous' if you will, universe collapsing on itself top a single point. Never thought I'd post anything beyond your limits (IMG: http://media.profileheaven.com/images/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 10 2010, 1:53 PM
|

I'm part of the forum furniture
       
Group: Advanced Forum Member
Posts: 7,727
Joined: 6-November 05
Member No.: 69,554
Status: Offline
Mood:

|
QUOTE(GudJohnSenXI @ Mar 10 2010, 1:42 PM)  Ah true. I have also heard the concept that the Bing band occurs due to a 'previous' if you will, universe collapsing on itself top a single point. Never thought I'd post anything beyond your limits (IMG: http://media.profileheaven.com/images/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) That made me laugh (IMG: http://media.profileheaven.com/images/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) There's a theory I'm sure was brought up on here which is the only reason I had a read into it in the first place. It states an oscillation of sorts of the universe, continually collapsing on and expanding itself. Maybe that's what you're meaning?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 10 2010, 4:45 PM
|

Hitler's Wet Dream.

Group: Site Administrator
Posts: 66,323
Joined: 4-October 05
From: Glenburn, Paisley
Member No.: 53,387
Status: Offline
Mood:

|
QUOTE(ATouchOfDutch @ Mar 10 2010, 4:37 PM)  Just remembered that this is called Hawking's radiation. At least, it is if I'm thinking of the same thing. Hawking's radiation is when black holes emit particles thus causing them to lose mass and ultimately, disappear. I wish I could text out the time travel theory on the event horizon of a blackhole. (IMG: http://media.profileheaven.com/images/style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 11 2010, 8:26 AM
|

Hitler's Wet Dream.

Group: Site Administrator
Posts: 66,323
Joined: 4-October 05
From: Glenburn, Paisley
Member No.: 53,387
Status: Offline
Mood:

|
QUOTE(The Orangutang @ Mar 10 2010, 11:18 PM)  whether the universe is infinite or not, the universe is expanding at the speed of light and since we can never travel faster than that its an imposibility to ever know True, Lorentzian manifolds, which are used in general relativity to construct space-time models show that no object can exceed the speed of light, however, it has been theorised that space-time can be warped so that something can move vast distances quicker than light would. The acual object isn't moving faster than ligh, but space has been warped infront of it to make the distance it travels alot shorter, thus traveling at a higher velocity than light.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 11 2010, 12:38 PM
|

I'm part of the forum furniture
       
Group: Advanced Forum Member
Posts: 7,441
Joined: 10-October 05
Member No.: 56,068
Status: Offline
Mood:

|
QUOTE(GudJohnSenXI @ Mar 11 2010, 8:26 AM)  True, Lorentzian manifolds, which are used in general relativity to construct space-time models show that no object can exceed the speed of light, however, it has been theorised that space-time can be warped so that something can move vast distances quicker than light would. The acual object isn't moving faster than ligh, but space has been warped infront of it to make the distance it travels alot shorter, thus traveling at a higher velocity than light. WARP DRIVE. However, one could never stop moving apparently - something to do with whoever is inside the warp bubble needing to communicate with the universe outside, which one cannot do, because one is exceeding the speed of light in the external reference frame. I read something ages ago which speculated about laying down tracks of ions of finite length along which warp corridors would travel. Course, you'd have to lay those tracks with conventional spacecraft, with conventional engines.
This post has been edited by Ill Culinary Behavior: Mar 11 2010, 12:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Powered By IP.Board
© 2012 IPS, Inc
|
Hide Ads
|